Emotional Bank Account - Why a Boss Should Open One

Posted on September 10th, 2007 in Employee Relations by Editor

Reprint and Repost Policy

by Dottie DeHart

Leaders, do your employees say communication could be better? Would they like more input into corporate decisions? Do they wish their contributions were more appreciated? If so, consider focusing more attention on what Quint Studer, CEO of Studer Group, calls “building an emotional bank account” with your employees. Not only is it the right thing to do, it’s good insurance for the future. Eventually, your employees will feel let down—so you must ensure there’s enough emotional capital in the account for that metaphorical rainy day.

“Most leaders truly want to do the right thing,” asserts Studer, author of “Hardwiring Excellence: Purpose, Worthwhile Work, Making a Difference.” “They want positive, productive, trust-based relationships with their people. But let’s face it: perfection doesn’t exist in leaders or in companies. You put in enough ‘deposits’ so that when the inevitable ‘withdrawals’ are made—let’s say you forget to say thank you or you have to institute pay cuts—there’s enough goodwill in the account to salvage those relationships.”

Withdrawals, Studer points out, are usually weightier than deposits—so great leaders do everything they can to make more of the latter. For instance:

Diagnose employee satisfaction—and act on the results. Use a proven, respected assessment tool to figure out where your problems lie. Then, commit to solving them. “One of the biggest issues we see in our work with clients is that people say, ‘Well, they measured our satisfaction but nobody responded to what we said,’” says Studer. “We advise organizations to be open about the results and have everyone vote on the top three issues. Eventually, you should address them all, but start with the top three.”

Harvest best practices. If assessments reveal that a high number of employees cite “poor communication” as a problem, dig deeper. You may find that one department manager got great communication scores. Find out what she is doing right and reward her. Then, work to apply her communication practices throughout the organization. “Your company doesn’t really have a problem with poor communication, just inconsistent communication,” says Studer. “Take what people are doing right and expand it. It’s much more effective than trying to start from scratch—and it builds goodwill.”

Announce that you’re making changes. Accept skepticism, but not cynicism. “Tell employees specifically what you are going to fix,” says Studer. “Naturally, they will be skeptical. You can even tell them that skepticism is fine, even expected, but ask that they try not to be cynical. If they start rolling their eyes and say, ‘Oh, we’ve heard all that before,’ tell them, ‘Look, you can be part of the problem or you can be open to change and see good things start to happen.’”

Go for “quick wins” to establish credibility. A quick win is an action that shows employees you really are committed to meeting their needs. If you are trying to establish an environment of fairness, for instance, don’t “pull rank” as a senior leader and cut in line. Don’t insist on having the parking spot nearest the door. Not only will it send a signal that you’re no more important than anyone else, the longer parking lot trek gives you the opportunity to talk to employees and stay on top of what’s going on in your company. Perhaps your quick win might take the form of getting a department a piece of equipment that employees have requested for years, or finally dealing with a low performer who’s been dragging everyone down.

“Round” relentlessly. Studer is a huge proponent of leadership “rounding,” a process similar to the one doctors use to check on their patients. In the business world, a CEO, V.P., or department manager “makes the rounds” daily to check on the status of his or her employees. “Basically, you take an hour a day to touch base with employees, make a personal connection, recognize successes, find out what’s going well, and determine what improvements can be made,” says Studer. “And of course, you fix any problems that come up. Rounding is the heart and soul of building the emotional bank account, because it shows employees day in and day out that you care.”

Get rid of low performers. Make no mistake: your employees don’t want to work with low performers. Nothing makes employees as discouraged and resentful as having to co-exist with people who don’t pull their own weight. In fact, low performers usually drive high performers right out the door. “Turning a blind eye to these people quickly drains the emotional bank account you’re trying to build up with your good employees,” says Studer. “However hard it may seem, you must move these people up or out.”

Avoid creating a “We/They” culture. The temptation to get on your employees’ good side by saying, for instance, “Well, I fought for the budget increase, but this is all I could get,” can be huge. It may feel easier or more comfortable at the moment, but ultimately you’re dividing the staff instead of uniting them. Of course, few leaders deliberately foster a “We/They” mentality, but it can be easy to do subconsciously. “Interestingly, the other side of the coin—‘I know you’ve begged for more money for years and here I took care of it in one afternoon!’—can be equally divisive,” adds Studer. “When you solve a big problem overnight, you might be undermining mid-level supervisors who’ve been working on a problem for a long time. Don’t walk around and perform magic.”

Be open and truthful with your employees, no matter how difficult it may be. “Let’s say you know that part of your organization is going to be outsourced in the next few months, or that there are going to be major cuts in benefits,” says Studer. “Even if it doesn’t directly affect your team, it certainly impacts them on an emotional level. Once the decision is final, you owe it to your employees to tell them. Don’t wait for them to read it in the paper. They will know that you knew all along—and a huge amount of trust will be lost.”

In the end, of course, trust is what building a healthy emotional bank account is all about, says Studer.

“When you’ve always been up front with your employees, and proven every day that you want what’s best for them, they’ll give you the benefit of the doubt when things don’t go their way,” he says. “They might not like it, and they may be angry, but they won’t feel betrayed to the point of leaving. They’ll realize that you’ve always treated them like adults, with respect and consideration. And that’s when you’ll truly see the value of the work you’ve been doing. That emotional capital you’ve invested will save the relationship—you’ll see that it’s the very foundation of a healthy company.”

Endorse Business Advice Daily And

-


 Subscribe RSS

Updates Via Email

Enter your email address:

Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Workplace

Posted on September 3rd, 2007 in Employee Relations, Management by Editor

Reprint and Repost Policy

by Bruce S. Feldacker

As you will note from reading the other articles in this Law Day Supplement, there are ample ways for an employer to get into legal difficulties in the employment law field. You may think that every employment law problem is destined for a long and expensive court battle, but that does not have to be the case. There is a better way—mediation—to resolve such disputes, either “in-house” without any litigation at all or at a much earlier stage in the litigation process.

Mediation is a confidential voluntary means to resolve a dispute. Some courts now require mediation as part of the litigation process, but even then neither party is compelled to reach agreement. Mediation seems to be especially effective in the employment law arena. For example, statistics compiled by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri indicate that the settlement rate for employment law cases is significantly higher than in other fields. This success is not surprising. After all, mediation is about opening lines of communication between parties to a dispute, and, in the employment context, the lines of communication frequently already exist even though they may be damaged. In fact, one of the primary aims of mediating a workplace dispute is to restore communication so that the employer and the employee may better understand each other’s position in a dispute. This understanding frequently leads to resolution.

Another reason for which mediation may be especially useful and successful in employment law disputes is that both the employer and the employee may have a common desire to resolve a matter; the employer to keep a valuable employee despite the current disagreement, and the employee to keep a job that he/she generally enjoys despite the difficulties. Mediation is especially effective in salvaging such situations because it can resolve a matter sooner before the parties’ positions harden and the financial (and emotional) commitment become too great. Even in a termination or a harassment situation, both sides may wish to resolve a matter quickly, confidentially, and inexpensively—all advantages that mediation offers over litigation.

Workplace violence is of growing concern to employers, and mediation may also play an important role in reducing this possibility. An employee may “vent” feelings of unfair treatment in a mediation session, guided by a skilled mediator, in a way that he/she would never do directly with the employer. An employee who believes that his /her complaints are being listened to and that an employer is making a good faith effort to resolve a situation is far less likely to become hostile. Also, although everything said and done in a mediation is absolutely confidential, mediation may help an employer identify employees who need outside counseling to deal with workplace pressure before a situation gets “out-of-hand.” And of course, supervisors are not always right. Mediation may help an employer identify supervisors who are not properly performing their responsibilities.

Many employers include Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) programs as part of their standard employment policy. An “in-house” ADR program may include both mediation and binding arbitration, or provide for only one of the two methods. Some employees—rightly or wrongly—may be reluctant to arbitrate disputes because they question the fairness of the process and prefer a jury trial. However, employees are far less likely to have reservations about a mediation program in which their participation is voluntary and the mediator simply assists the parties in reaching a mutual resolution. One advantage of an ADR program is that it can be tailored to the needs of a particular workplace. The ‘best” program is a matter on which employers should consult with their own counsel or someone experienced in the ADR field.

You don’t need to be a large employer to benefit from the mediation process. Some large companies have pre-selected mediators who rotate cases. But capable experienced mediators are available on a case-by-case basis. Both the Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis and the Missouri Bar Association maintain lists of certified mediators. You can also obtain the names of experienced mediators from such organizations as the Association for Conflict Resolution, the Association of Missouri Mediators, or the Association of Attorney Mediators. A number of competent mediation providers are listed under “mediation” in classified telephone directories.

Give mediation a chance the next time you have an employment related dispute. You won’t regret your decision!

Endorse Business Advice Daily And

-


 Subscribe RSS

Updates Via Email

Enter your email address:

Goal Planning in Sync with Organization Strategy

Posted on September 2nd, 2007 in Employee Relations, Management by Editor

Reprint and Repost Policy

by Dottie DeHart

Lewis Carroll’s Cheshire cat said it best: When you don’t know where you’re going, any road will get you there. Do your employees know where they are going? It’s a good question to ponder as the next quarter approaches. You may assume your people are working toward goals that advance your corporate vision. But blind assumptions are rarely correct. Joanne G. Sujansky, CEO of KEYGroup, says if goal-setting is not a priority, your employees will likely view your company as “wonderland”—as in “Wonder what we should be doing next?”

This is not a mere suspicion on Sujansky’s part. A recent survey commissioned by KEYGroup found that almost half of the respondents aren’t working toward clear-cut goals. And it’s not that they don’t want to—it’s that leaders aren’t asking them to.

“Too many companies are dropping the ball in regard to helping their employees set and work toward well-defined goals,” she notes. “And when employees don’t have crystal clear goals to work toward, they’re going to waste time and resources. They’re going to be inefficient. Becoming goal-oriented is one of the best things you can do for your company. It shows up in your financials and in your overall culture—and, of course, the two are inextricably linked.”

So if you suspect your employees would agree with the aforementioned survey respondents, what can you do about it? How can you set up “goal posts” in your own company? Sujansky offers the following tips:

Share the “big picture” with employees. You must run a completely transparent operation. Sujansky—who constantly urges clients to evolve into what she calls a Vibrant Entrepreneurial Organization, or VEO—cannot stress this point enough. “In a VEO, employees have a sense of ownership,” she says. “They know beyond the shadow of a doubt what your company stands for and where it’s going. I mean, if they don’t know the big picture, how can they own it? Besides, when employees have a clear picture of your mission and vision, the goals you help them set will make sense to them. They’ll be more likely to buy into and achieve those goals.”

Work with employees to set challenging, yet attainable goals. That’s right, work with them. Don’t impose goals on your employees. Remember, you’re looking for buy-in. “Sit down with employees and hammer out goals together,” Sujansky suggests. “Make it a priority. I think this is one of those areas in which employers think their people somehow ‘know’ what they’re supposed to be doing, perhaps by osmosis. Never assume that. Clear and frequent communication with their leaders is as vital to your employees’ performance as, say, a phone and a computer.”

Give them a real voice in the company’s future. Don’t just let employees set their own goals. Let them have real input into the company’s future. “No matter how often you tell your employees ‘this is your company, too,’ if they have no real say-so, it’s clearly just lip service,” says Sujansky. “Collaborate with them. Solicit their ideas and contributions. More to the point, actually take their advice and run with it. If you don’t trust your employees enough to help shape your company’s future, why did you hire them in the first place?”

Make sure their work is meaningful.
No one likes busywork or routine, mind-numbing tasks. Give your employees challenging assignments and goals that stimulate their minds and that have a real impact on your organization. “If you sense that an employee is just going through the motions, take him to lunch and ask, ‘What would challenge you?’” suggests Sujansky. “Ask him to come up with a new product or service or process for your company and then let him be in charge of the project. It’s amazing how few leaders really do this—but it’s a tremendously empowering and inspiring gesture.”

Tell your employees it’s okay to take risks—in fact, it’s expected. A big part of having a VEO involves the R-word: Risk. Without it there can be no significant gain. This is the real reason you need to keep the “big picture” in front of employees at all times—it helps them take calculated risks aimed at advancing not only their own goals but also your corporate vision. “When people are free to take risks, they are likely to explore multiple possibilities and find unexpected solutions,” says Sujansky. “They will own these solutions and hold themselves accountable. To inspire risk-taking in your employees, take risks yourself. In this way you model the creative spirit you want them to embrace.”

Put systems in place for measuring productivity. In the business world the bottom line is, of course, the bottom line. The whole point of goal-setting is to help employees become more productive. That’s why you must be sure not to confuse activity with progress. Put systems in place for measuring productivity and live by them. “Remember this mantra: what gets measured, gets done,” advises Sujansky. “Create policies that ensure that the ‘urgent’ doesn’t take precedence over the ‘important,’ and do everything you can to eliminate redundancies and busywork.”

Give feedback, both formal and “real time.” Establish ongoing evaluative processes so people can get feedback on how well they’re meeting their goals. But don’t limit feedback to formal evaluations. Give it on the spot. Yes, you should tell people in “real time” what they’re doing wrong so they can correct it, but it’s even more important to tell them what they’re doing right. “That’s spontaneous coaching and it’s one of the most critical elements of an entrepreneurial culture,” Sujansky says. “It’s the pathway to productivity. This kind of feedback refines the processes by which they meet their goals today, and paves the way for them to meet ever-more-ambitious goals in the future.”

If this list seems daunting, well, that’s understandable. Creating a goal-oriented workplace is tantamount to transforming your corporate culture. Very few companies can go it alone.

“Your best thinking got you to where you are now,” says Sujansky. “Sometimes bringing in an outside source to raise your level of self-awareness is the solution. Boosting productivity and changing your culture will take some effort. It will shake up the status quo. But while change is challenging, it’s also inspiring and energizing. It’s often the best thing that can happen to your employees and your entire organization.”

Endorse Business Advice Daily And

-


 Subscribe RSS

Updates Via Email

Enter your email address:

Future Trends - One Experts Future View of Health Care Benefits

Posted on August 15th, 2007 in Employee Relations, Strategy by Editor

Reprint and Repost Policy

by Angie Rightnowar

When it comes to the future of health care, there is ample room for improvement in value, according to Ian Morrison, an internationally known futurist, author and health care consultant.

Morrison defines “value” as access plus quality divided by cost. “Unfortunately, we’re not doing so well on access and cost; and quality remains difficult to measure,” he said. According to Morrison, 51% of consumers currently have access to adequate tools for informed health care decision making. Only 24% use the tools available, and only half of those considered the tools available to be helpful.

As cost-shifting continues, Morrison predicts that “pay for performance,” with open exchange of performance and quality information, will emerge as a positive change in the health care industry. Said Morrison, “In five years, it is likely that an estimated 63% of consumers will use quality ratings when selecting a health plan, and 59% will use them when selecting a hospital.”

Morrison made his comments at the recent third annual futureFOCUS seminar, titled “The Changing World of Healthcare Benefits.” The event was sponsored by Delta Dental of Missouri. The annual conference is designed to provide benefit managers, executives and producers with a window on the future of health benefits. As the keynote speaker, Morrison shared his views on